Utilitarian Theory Of Moral Status - 1189 Words

In this paper, I intend to show that utilitarian theory of moral status is much more preferable than deontological approach. I will demonstrate this idea by using by using the concept of moral laws by Immanuel Kant and John Mill along with Peter Singer’s Speciesism and Moral Status. Moral status is a term that deals with who and what is more valuable, or have higher quality, in which they should be treated specially; and both deontological and utilitarian aspect of moral status is different from one and another. According to Kant, in deontological point of view, â€Å"act in regard to every rational being (yourself and others) that he may at the same time count in your maxim as an end in himself, is thus basically the same as the principle:†¦show more content†¦Utilitarian believes that actions are always good as long as if the consequences let individuals have a higher level of happiness disregarding the objects behind those actions. He also implies that if a being is not capable of enjoying happiness nor experiencing suffering that it should not be considered as moral beings. Thus, all animals are equal in Mill’s point of view. The deontological approach of moral status implies that only rational beings, who has the cognitive ability, should be respected, which it often rebuttal the perspective of utilitarian doctrine. This approach judge morality and motivations behind every action because it is absolutely impractical because experiences and actions are connected with one and another. Kantian approach believes that all human beings are superior to all other species because we have cognitive ability or self-conscious ability. Nonhuman animals are not capable of making nor responding to moral decisions but a human has moral capabilities because â€Å"rational being must so act as if he were through the maxim always a legislating member in the universal kingdom of ends† (Kant, 43). Kant is basically addressing that human beings are self-legislative and they are governed by moral rules. Only human beings are qualified to make moral claims and judgments, which make human beings intellectual.Show MoreRela tedMoral Theory Of Max Act Utilitarianism1576 Words   |  7 Pagesumbrella term, consequentialism has a much more specific moral theory known as max act utilitarianism. Max act utilitarianism is one of the most well known and influential theories that provides the best notion for the theory of right conduct. After a brief explanation of act utilitarianism, the argument of this paper will then seek to favor why act utilitarianism provides a plausible theory of right conduct. What it is: In general, utilitarians moral values are all about making the best decision thatRead MoreR. G. Frey s Moral Standing, The Value Of Lives, And Speciesism1200 Words   |  5 PagesThe focus of this paper will be R. G. Frey’s passage in â€Å"Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism†. The intended objection of the focus will be two moral theories, Kantianism and Act Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism being the rebuttal of the Kantianism view on the moral issue at hand. In this passage the central conclusion is that the value of life, whether that be humans or animals is contributed to the quality of life, the quality is related to its richness being related to the life’sRead MoreDifference Between Utilitarianism And Kant1026 Words   |  5 Pagesand in class, we have discussed the moral status of many different actions using the guidelines of different moral theories. I will be focusing on just two of the theories that we’ve covered: the Kantian perspective and the Utilitarian perspective. In this paper, I will present the two perspectives and give my analysis of the differences between the ways in which these two theories determine the moral status of an action. Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that morality should be based on producingRead MoreVirtue Ethics : Moral Philosophy For Determining The Moral Permissibility Of Abortion1283 Words   |  6 PagesRosalind Hursthouse argued that virtue ethics is the preferable moral philosophy for determining the moral permissibility of abortion because it avoids the drawbacks from the utilitarian approach, and the deontological approach. I will demonstrate that virtue ethics is preferable because (i) it does not require a comprehension of problematic abstract concepts, and because (ii) it is sensitive to circumstantial variation. This paper will argue that virtue ethics is the preferable ethical approachRead MoreAnimals Used in Research1458 Words   |  6 Pagesrights activist.. When it come to the moral ethics and moral status of animals these are problematic subjects. You are going to have two very opposing sides, some people are tolerable with animals being used in animal research because they feel that these animals have no moral status, they are not autonomous, and they are not sentient, and they are here for our misuse, abuse and consumption. The first theory that I will be looking at is deontological theory of Immanuel Kant, and autonomy. Kant’sRead MoreEuthanasi An Utilitarian Perspective1676 Words   |  7 Pagesnot involve the doctor’s moral feelings for they are irrelevant and therefore should be practiced to ensure that the terminally-ill patients and the public do not undergo unnecessary suffering. Williams argues that the utilitarian view fails to take the consideration of the agent’s moral feelings performing the act. I contend that this fails because Mill’s theory strongly implies that ends are desirable in so far as people desire them. I will first articulate the utilitarian perspective on euthanasiaRead MoreDr. Ethos, The Chief Resident Of A Hospital1591 Words   |  7 Pagesstate of the hospital, the fact that he was al ready about operate on the old man, as well as the good Doctor’s status as the prime transplant surgeon, Dr. Ethos knows that the procedure could go off without a problem. However, the cranky old man would have to die, or rather be killed, in order to successfully treat all the patients. The question is, what would Dr. Ethos do, if he were Utilitarian (Act vs. Rule)? What would Dr. Ethos do, if he were a Deontologist (Kantian)? Utilitarianism John S. MillRead MoreUtilitarianism, By John Rawls And Robert Nozick1486 Words   |  6 PagesUtilitarianism is a moral theory according to which an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility. An action conforms to the principle of utility if and only if its performance will be more productive of pleasure or happiness, or more preventive of pain and happiness, than any alternative. The rightness of an action entirely depends on the value of its consequences, this is why the theory is described as consequentialist. The â€Å"separateness of persons† is an objection againstRead MoreUtilitarianism : The Greatest Happiness Principle1176 Words   |  5 PagesUtilitarianism John S. Mill describes utilitarianism, also known as â€Å"The greatest happiness principle†, as a philosophical theory of morality. This theory is focused on the end result (a consequential theory) rather than the motive behind it. It argues that the morality of the action is solely dependent on the action’s results. The action is morally ethical as long as it produces the greatest happiness for the majority of people involved. Mill mentions, â€Å"†¦ the greatest happiness principle holdsRead MoreApplying Normative Theories Of A Moral Situation996 Words   |  4 PagesCase 2.3 from â€Å"Applying Normative Theories to a Moral Situation† will be used for a brief analysis of two of the six moral theories recently studied. As a professional I am encountered with a few ethical dilemmas in case 2.3. For example, is the 4 years old child my only patient? If not, how does patient client confidentiality factor into this case? As a professional physician should I lie to my patient first and foremost? Should I lie to the other members of the family, to my profession, and last